
My perspective of the controversial Midwest Block re-zoning case was supposed to be from the sidelines. After recusing myself months ago from voting, the week prior to the council's vote approving the expansion was pretty interesting. The council voted, and tonight, two weeks later, the ordinance went into effect automatically without my signature under provisions in the City Charter. I remain cautiously optimistic about the future. Here's a summary of events leading up to the vote -- a perspective "from the sidelines":
On Tuesday a neighbor said I was turning my back on my family. On Wednesday I was accused by a MB executive of going behind his back to influence the decision.
Before the hearing the County Commission wrote a letter threatening to withhold promised cooperative street funding. At the hearing a former mayor apologized for requesting the letter.
A civic organization where I am a board member took a public position without approval of its board. I will give them the latest of version of Corporations 101 for Christmas.
Planned Unit Developments remain as mysterious as the Blessed Trinity. I still think "PUD" in our code really stands for "Prettymuch Un Decided."
A broadcast email prior to the hearing said the Mayor was conspiring to influence the council. A council member after the hearing said he appreciated how I did not try to influence his opinion.
The Comprehensive Plan was not a factor. An unsigned, unreviewed document presented without prior notice was a huge factor.
Regardless of our positions, maybe we can all look back and learn something from this zoning case. For my part, I have concluded it is no fun at all sitting on the sidelines.